Is Second Generation Metal-On-Metal Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With a 28 mm Head a Worthy Option?* A 12-to 18-Year Follow-Up Study

Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

22
Citations

SCOPUS

23

초록

To determine whether MoM THA with a small head is still worthy of use, we investigated survivorship, complications, and factors influencing failure. Of 149 consecutive patients (195 hips), 141 (180 hips) of mean age 43 (19-55) years were available for review at a mean of 14.4 years postoperatively. Survivorship for cup revision for any cause was 97.8% at 18.4 years postoperatively. Nine hips generated complaints of groin pain; six showed periacetabular osteolysis, one had pain without radiological change, and two were diagnosed as symptomatic pseudotumors. Four of six hips with periacetabular osteolysis or aseptic loosening were revised. Surgery-and patient-related factors had no effect in results. Our results are encouraging, however, further study will be necessary to determine the incidence and fates of pseudotumors after MoM THA with a small head.

키워드

metal on metalsmall headtotal hip arthroplastysurvivorshippseudotumorINFLAMMATORY PSEUDOTUMORWEAR-RATESREPLACEMENTPOLYETHYLENEOSTEOLYSISCOMPONENTSFAILURERISKCUPARTICULATION
제목
Is Second Generation Metal-On-Metal Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With a 28 mm Head a Worthy Option?* A 12-to 18-Year Follow-Up Study
저자
Hwang, Kyu-TaeKim, Young-HoKim, Yee-SukChoi, Il-Yong
DOI
10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.022
발행일
2013-12
유형
Article
저널명
Journal of Arthroplasty
28
10
페이지
1828 ~ 1833