2013년 지적재산법 중요 판례

A Study on Precedents regarding Intellectual Property Law in 2013
  • 박성호

초록

There are not a few decisions of Korean courts in 2013 which should be reviewedtheoretically on the level of intellectual property law. The objective of this paper is to examine andreview judgements concerning intellectual property law rendered by the Supreme Court in 2013. This paper is composed of five parts. Part I is the introduction. Part II point out some problematiccases with the novelty and inventive step standard of invention defined by numerical limitation, thecompensation for the employee’s invention, the proof of generally known technology, the effect forprinciple against double jeopardy, and the partial design. Part III reviews the cases associated withthe standard point for determining the distinctiveness acquired through using the pre-usedtrademark in trademark liable to deceive consumers, the trademark use as a design, and the trialfor trademark cancellation for non use. Part IV reviews the cases regarding the limitation ofintegrity right by implicit consent, and the standard to determine of the quotation of publishedworks. Part V is the conclusion.

키워드

수치한정발명의 신규성직무발명의보상주지관용기술의 증명부분디자인수요자 기만 상표상표의디자인적 사용불사용취소심판묵시적 동의에 의한 동일성유지권의제한공표된 저작물의 인용novelty of invention defined by numerical limitationcompensation for the employee’s inventionproof of generally known technologypartial designtrademark liable to deceive consumerstrademark use as a designtrial for trademark cancellation for non uselimitation of integrity right by implicit consentquotation of published works
제목
2013년 지적재산법 중요 판례
제목 (타언어)
A Study on Precedents regarding Intellectual Property Law in 2013
저자
박성호
발행일
2014-03
저널명
인권과 정의
440
페이지
186 ~ 200