특허권 중재가능성에 관한 소고

A study on the Possibility of patent arbitration
  • 윤선희
  • 이헌희

초록

Judgment on the validity of patents on the subject of an arbitration does not. In other words, the occurrence of patents generated by the administrative action, and such administrative action by an authorized agency may be treated as legitimate until it is canceled. However, recent Supreme Court judgment on novelty and inventive step as well as judgments about the validity of the patent also made ​​possible by the judiciary. This progress even in the mediation of an arbitral award which is premised on the validity of patents can be seen that possible. However, if the arbitration by an arbitrator if possible a certain portion of the limit exists. In other words, the effect of arbitration between the parties is valid. This patent is valid and invalid in arbitration even if the judgment relative to the effect ceases. In addition, the arbitration award and patent invalidation trial is in progress at the same time, if you consequently will reach a different conclusion. This can cause problems of double track. In addition, by extending the critical target recognition and enforcement in other countries can cause problems. Despite these problems, now about the validity of patents that it is possible intervention is necessary to discuss again.

키워드

중재특허중재특허중재가능성진보성arbitrationpatent arbitrationvalidity of the patentinventive step
제목
특허권 중재가능성에 관한 소고
제목 (타언어)
A study on the Possibility of patent arbitration
저자
윤선희이헌희
DOI
10.16998/jas.2012.22.1.111
발행일
2012-03
저널명
중재연구
22
1
페이지
111 ~ 130

파일 다운로드