To Be Biased or Not To Be: Choosing between Design Fixation and Design Intentionality

Citations

SCOPUS

5

초록

In the study, we explored potential design decision biases by understanding the relationship of the information being used and overconfidence of design outcomes that arise from the anchoring process in design. A total of twenty-eight industrial designers carried out a two-way between-subjects study administered by the four types of design exercise. Designers showed a strong anchoring effect when they employed “consistent knowledge-evidence” information rather than “inconsistent knowledge-evidence” information given. The empirical findings shed light on a double-edged anchoring effect in the design process, further suggesting the implications of the use of design information for educating HCI practitioners.

키워드

Adjustment; Anchoring; Decision making; Design intentionality; Overconfidence bias; Decision making; Human computer interaction; Human engineering; Product design; Adjustment; Anchoring; Anchoring effects; Design information; Empirical findings; Industrial designers; Intentionality; Overconfidence bias; Design
제목
To Be Biased or Not To Be: Choosing between Design Fixation and Design Intentionality
저자
Kim, Jieun; Ryu, Hokyoung; Kim, Hokyoung
DOI
10.1145/2468356.2468418
발행일
2013-04
유형
Conference Paper
저널명
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings
권
2013-April
페이지
349 ~ 354