왜 메타이론(metatheory)인가?: IR에서 메타이론적 논쟁과 이해의 유용성

Making a case for Metatheory in IR

초록

In comtemporary International Relations (IR) scholarship, metatheory or metatheoretical debates are often seen as pernicious to the progress in IR. This is especially so in the mainstream of IR, namely American IR. In contrast to a so-called anti-metatheorical or pragmatist position, this article shows why metatheoretical debates, which appears “irresolvable”, are important and how they contribute to IR. To this end, the article discusses different forms of truth. In addition, positivism, critical theory and scientific realism are discussed in the context of IR. In conclusion, this article argues that active engagement in metatheoretical debates at the level of ontology and epistemology can bring about a more pluralistic field of IR and a critical foundation on which the existing mainstream IR theory is to be tested in multiple dimensions.

키워드

International Relations TheoryMetatheoryOntologyEpistemologyPositivismPost-positivismConstructivism국제정치이론메타이론존재론인식론실증주의탈실증주의구성주의
제목
왜 메타이론(metatheory)인가?: IR에서 메타이론적 논쟁과 이해의 유용성
제목 (타언어)
Making a case for Metatheory in IR
저자
은용수
DOI
10.18854/kpsr.2015.49.4.005
발행일
2015-09
저널명
한국정치학회보
49
4
페이지
127 ~ 156