온라인서비스제공자에 대한 정보제공청구권에 관한 비교법적 연구 – 독일과 일본을 중심으로 –

A comparative study on the ‘Right of Information’ against online service provider

초록

The right of information mentioned in Article 18.10 of the KORUS FTA(Article 10.16 of KOR-EU FTA) has been introduced in Korea. It is new to Korea. Such right of information(Auskunft) can be ordered as a final remedy, or in the course of interim procedures by courts. Article 10.45 of KOR-EU FTA Ch. 10 requires persons who are found in possession of infringing goods on a commercial scale or professional service providers to provide “information on the origin and distribution networks of the goods or services” upon request of the plaintiff. The information shall comprise the names and addresses of the producers, manufacturers, distributors, suppliers and other previous holders of the goods or services. However, the amended Korean Copyright Act does not provide that competent authorities may provide safeguards against misuse, against use in civil or criminal proceedings, against misuse of confidential information or in order to “afford an opportunity for refusing to provide information which would force the person to admit his own participation in an infringement.” The purpose of this article is to show the legal issues about the right of information provision related to copyright enforcement.

키워드

CopyrightLiability of OSPFTA Right of Information저작권온라인서비스제공자의 책임FTA정보제공청구권
제목
온라인서비스제공자에 대한 정보제공청구권에 관한 비교법적 연구 – 독일과 일본을 중심으로 –
제목 (타언어)
A comparative study on the ‘Right of Information’ against online service provider
저자
김병일
발행일
2012-00
저널명
계간 저작권
25
1
페이지
228 ~ 252