2020년 지적재산법 중요판례평석

Analysis of Intellectual Property Judgments by Korean Supreme Court in 2020
  • 박성호

초록

This paper is an analysis and review of important Supreme Court decisions in 2020 on Intellectual Property Law. This paper consists of a total of 6 chapters. Chapter 1 is an introduction. In Chapter 2, five decisions on the patent law were analyzed and reviewed. Among them, the notable decisions are the case concerning the scope of hearing in litigation to revoke a trial ruling on the grounds for breach of non bis in idem, and the case as to whether the confirmation of patent-correction ruling after the closing of fact-finding proceedings in litigation to revoke a trial ruling is grounds for retrial. In particular, the later decision was the en banc decision, which excluded the confirmation of patent correction judgment from the grounds for retrial. Therefore, this decision will have a great influence on our trial practice in the future. As a countermeasure against this, we need to systematically improve the trial practice system. In Chapter 3, five decisions on the trademark law were analyzed and reviewed. Among them, the notable decisions are the case as to cancellation of trademark registration based on use for unlawful purpose of trademark licensee, and the case concerning breach of contract and the rule of exhaustion in trademark. The former decision is important in that it recognized the need to reasonably resolve disputes arising between past and present trademark owners. However, there are doubts about the conclusion of the decision. The later decision will serve as a catalyst for more cases in the future. In Chapter 4, seven decisions on the unfair competition prevention law were analyzed and reviewed. Among them, decisions related to the application standards of the supplementary general provision need to be reviewed both practically and academically. In Chapter 5, three decisions on the copyright law were reviewed. Among them, the case concerning the criteria for judging the creativity of architectural works is important.

키워드

일사부재리특허 정정 심결의 확정과 재심 사유상표권의 소진부정사용에 의한 상표등록취소보충적 일반조항건축저작물의 창작성 판단기준회복저작물non bis in idemconfirmation of patent-correction ruling and grounds for retrialexhaustion of trademark rightcancellation of trademark registration based on use for unlawful purposesupplementary general provisioncriteria for judging the creativity of architectural workrestored works
제목
2020년 지적재산법 중요판례평석
제목 (타언어)
Analysis of Intellectual Property Judgments by Korean Supreme Court in 2020
저자
박성호
DOI
10.22999/hraj..497.202105.008
발행일
2021-05
저널명
인권과 정의
497
페이지
183 ~ 215

파일 다운로드