Perceived Fairness of Performance Appraisals in the Federal Government: Does It Matter?

Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

58
Citations

SCOPUS

61

초록

Studies suggest that the success of the performance appraisal system may depend on how to manage employees' perceptions of its fairness, not the system per se. Using the 2005 Merit Principles Survey, this study tests the efficacy of perceived fairness of performance appraisals as a key determinant of intrinsic motivation. The purpose of this article is twofold: (a) to identify factors of perceived fairness of performance appraisal and (b) to assess the differential impact of each factor of perceived fairness of performance appraisal on intrinsic motivation. An exploratory factor analysis generated three separate but interrelated notions of perceived fairness variables: distributive, procedural, and interactional fairness. Using these three perceived fairness variables, a hierarchical regression analysis was performed. The results showed that although all three perceived fairness variables positively associated with intrinsic motivation, they accounted for only 5% of variance in prediction. When control variables were added, only perceived procedural fairness appeared to positively affect intrinsic motivation. The results raise the question of the role of performance appraisals as a motivational tool for performance improvement. Nonetheless, managing perceived procedural fairness may still be a useful lever for enhancing intrinsic motivation.

키워드

performance appraisalperceived fairnessintrinsic motivationorganizational justiceINTRINSIC MOTIVATIONPUBLIC-SECTORORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICEEMPLOYEE MOTIVATIONJOB-PERFORMANCEWORK MOTIVATIONMERIT PAYSYSTEMSSATISFACTIONSUPERVISORS
제목
Perceived Fairness of Performance Appraisals in the Federal Government: Does It Matter?
저자
Kim, Seok EunRubianty, Dian
DOI
10.1177/0734371X11428903
발행일
2011-12
유형
Article
저널명
Review of Public Personnel Administration
31
4
페이지
329 ~ 348