2016년 지적재산법 중요 판례

A Study on Precedents regarding Intellectual Property Law in 2016
  • 박성호

초록

The objective of this paper is to examine and review judgements concerning intellectual property law rendered by Korean Supreme Court in 2016. This paper is composed of five parts. Part I is introduction. Part II points out some problematic cases with method of determining inventive step of any particular invention’s relation to prior documents, prohibition of hindsight bias in inventive step analysis, possibility of the active patent right scope declaration trial on the subject matter of registered patent right, and method of determining non-creative easiness by combination of publicly known form and widely known form. Part III reviews the cases associated with registration in the name of the agent or representative of the proprietor without the latter’s authorization, interpretation of statutory damages under Korean Trademark Act, criteria for unfair competition acts of group mark use after segregation of group enterprises, and copying of configuration of goods. Part IV reviews the cases regarding the establishment of joint works in the case of ex post facto participation, referencing methods and plagiarism as a research misconducts, and the meaning of right to cinematize a work Article 99(1) of Korean Copyright Act. Part V is conclusion.

키워드

진보성사후고찰권리범위확인심판창작비용이성법정손해배상부정경쟁행위기업그룹 분리상품형태의 모방공동저작물연구부정행위표절출처표시방법영상화권nventive stepHindsightTrial to confirm the scope of a patentNon-creative easinessStatutory damagesUnfair competition actsSegregation of group enterprisesCopying of configuration of goodsJoint worksResearch misconductsPlagiarismReferencing methodsRight to cinematize a work
제목
2016년 지적재산법 중요 판례
제목 (타언어)
A Study on Precedents regarding Intellectual Property Law in 2016
저자
박성호
DOI
10.22999/hraj..464.201703.012
발행일
2017-03
저널명
인권과 정의
464
페이지
203 ~ 218

파일 다운로드