Embedding Methods or Link-based Similarity Measures, Which is Better for Link Prediction?

Citations

SCOPUS

0

초록

The link prediction task has attracted significant attention in the literature. Link-based similarity measures (in short, similarity measures) are the conventional methods for this task, while recently graph embedding methods (in short, embedding methods) are widely employed as well. In this paper, we extensively investigate the effectiveness of embedding methods and similarity measures (i.e., both non-recursive and recursive ones) in link prediction. Our experimental results with three real-world datasets demonstrate that 1) recursive similarity measures are not beneficial in this task than non-recursive one,2) increasing the number of dimensions in vectors may not help improve the accuracy of embedding methods, and 3) in comparison with embedding methods, Adamic/Adar, a non-recursive similarity measure, can be a useful method for link prediction since it shows promising results while being parameter-free.

키워드

AUCgraph embedding methodslink predictionlink-based similarity measuresEmbeddingsAUCConventional methodsEmbedding methodGraph embedding methodGraph embeddingsLink predictionLink-basedLink-based similarity measurePrediction tasksSimilarity measureForecasting
제목
Embedding Methods or Link-based Similarity Measures, Which is Better for Link Prediction?
저자
Hamedani, Masoud ReyhaniKim, Sang-Wook
DOI
10.1109/IC-NIDC54101.2021.9660590
발행일
2022-01
유형
Conference Paper
저널명
Proceedings of 2021 7th IEEE International Conference on Network Intelligence and Digital Content, IC-NIDC 2021
페이지
378 ~ 382