2011년 지적재산법 중요 판례

A Study on Precedents regarding Intellectual Property Law in 2011
  • 박성호

초록

There are not a few decisions of Korean courts in 2011 which should be reviewed theoretically on the level of intellectual property law. Primarily, the objective of this paper is to examine and review judgements concerning intellectual property law rendered by the Supreme Court in 2011. This paper is composed of five parts. Part I is the introduction. Part II points out some problematic cases with the application of the provision of exception to laid-open patent application, the criteria for determining of inventive step of invention related to a new polymorphic crystal form, identity of invention in whole application as a prior application, and compensation for the employee invention etc. Part III reviews the cases associated with the dependence relation to design right of another person, use of trademark, ineffectiveness of trademark right, and interest of litigation for the annulment litigations for the decisions of trials to confirm the scope of trademark etc. Part IV reviews the cases unconstitutionality of Copyright Act section 104. Part V is the conclusion.

키워드

Invention Related to A Polymorphic Crystal FormIdentity of InventionWhole Application as A Prior ApplicationCompensation for Employee InventionDependence Relation to Design Right of Another PersonUse of TrademarkIneffectiveness of Trademark RightInterest of Litigation for the Annulment Litigations for the Decisions of Trials to Confirm the Scope of TrademarkUnconstitutionality of Copyright Act Section 104결정다형 발명발명의 동일성확대된선출원직무발명의 보상디자인권의이용관계상표의 사용상표권의 제한권리범위확인심판의심결취소소송에서의 소의 이익저작권법 제104조의 위헌성
제목
2011년 지적재산법 중요 판례
제목 (타언어)
A Study on Precedents regarding Intellectual Property Law in 2011
저자
박성호
DOI
10.22999/hraj..424.201203.011
발행일
2012-03
저널명
인권과 정의
424
페이지
147 ~ 160

파일 다운로드