인식적 뉴컴 문제와 인식적 결정이론

Epistemic Newcomb Problem and Epistemic Decision Theory

초록

Roughly speaking, Practical Decision Theory is divided into Evidential Practical Decision Theory and Causal Practical Decision Theory. As well known, many philosophers think that the Newcomb Problem provides good reason for Causal Practical Decision Theory. Similar to Practical Decision Theory, Epistemic Decision Theory is divided into Evidential Epistemic Decision Theory and Causal Epistemic Decision Theory. Interestingly, Hilary Greaves have recently provided the Epistemic Newcomb Problem. She claims that it provides good reason for Causal Epistemic Decision Theory as the Newcomb Problem does for Causal Practical Decision Theory. However, I show that, in light of the crucial difference between Practical Decision Theory/the Newcomb problem and Epistemic Decision Theory/the Epistemic Newcomb problem, the Epistemic Newcomb problem fails to provide as good reason for Epistemic Causal Decision Theory as the Newcomb Problem does for Practical Causal Decision Theory.

키워드

실천적 결정이론증거적 실천적 결정이론인과적 실천적 결정이론전통적 뉴컴 문제인식적 결정이론증거적 인식적 결정이론인과적 인식적 결정이론인식적 뉴컴 문제Practical Decision TheoryEvidential Decision TheoryCausal Decision TheoryNewcomb ProblemEpistemic Decision TheoryEvidential Epistemic Decision TheoryCausal Epistemic Decision Theory
제목
인식적 뉴컴 문제와 인식적 결정이론
제목 (타언어)
Epistemic Newcomb Problem and Epistemic Decision Theory
저자
정재민
DOI
10.18694/KJP.2021.2.146.95
발행일
2021-02
저널명
철학
146
페이지
95 ~ 118