The Safety and Feasibility of the Single-Port Laparoscopic Repair of Intraperitoneal Bladder Rupture

Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

2
Citations

SCOPUS

2

초록

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in the repair of intraperitoneal bladder rupture. Patients and Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent LESS for intraperitoneal bladder rupture in three hospitals in Korea were included prospectively in this study. LESS was performed using a homemade single-port device composed of an Alexis wound retractor and a surgical glove. Results: Of the 22 patients, 18 were male. The mean age was 40.5011.83 years. The mean body mass index was 24.19 +/- 2.61kg/m(2). The cause of rupture was trauma (n=21) or iatrogenic injury (n=1). The mean bladder rupture diameter was 3.41 +/- 1.01cm. LESS bladder rupture repair was completed effectively in all patients. The mean operative time was 89.05 +/- 11.29 minutes. The mean length of hospital stay was 2.91 +/- 0.53 days. Postoperatively, none of the patients required patient-controlled analgesia, and none developed major complications. The urethral Foley catheter was removed 7.68 +/- 2.08 days after surgery. Conclusions: LESS repair of intraperitoneal bladder rupture, which involves a homemade single-port device, was a feasible and safe alternative to conventional laparoscopy in this case series.

키워드

urinary bladderrupturelaparoscopysurgical proceduresminimally invasiveBLUNT ABDOMINAL-TRAUMASITE SURGERYINITIAL-EXPERIENCEMANAGEMENTURETEROLITHOTOMY
제목
The Safety and Feasibility of the Single-Port Laparoscopic Repair of Intraperitoneal Bladder Rupture
저자
Chung, Jae HoonKim, Kyu ShikChoi, Hong YongMoon, Hong SangKim, Yong TaePark, Sung YulOh, Cheol YoungLee, Ki SooKim, Tae HyoLee, Seung Wook
DOI
10.1089/end.2017.0733
발행일
2018-05
유형
Article
저널명
Journal of Endourology
32
5
페이지
403 ~ 409