일사본 ≪동몽학≫에 대하여

초록

Ilsa script(一簑本) ≪Dongmonghak(童蒙學)≫ was introduced and compared with the Tokyo script ≪Baekryeonchohae(百聯抄解解)≫ which was more than 300 years ago. First of all, the bibliography was examined through the original of ≪Dongmonghak(童蒙學)≫. On the original cover, a red thread was newly used to stabilize a bundle of five holes. The author is unknown. It was considered to have been published in the mid to late 19th century. It is a ten-page woodblock print. The Eonhaemun is divided into lines at the top, and there is no Chinese character line at the bottom. It is in the form of a two-tiered bookboard. Meanwhile, previous studies judged this book as ≪Baekryeonchohae(百聯抄解解)≫. But here I saw this book as a different book. This is because the amount and quality of the contents are not completely the same. Some Chinese poems are missing from ≪Baekryeonchohae(百聯抄解解)≫, and some are newly added. Korean poems <Jemul Yeomjeong(題勿染亭)> and four Chinese poems is new compared to ≪Dongmonghak(童蒙學)≫. The absolute difference was that only 79 poems were included in ≪Dongmonghak(童蒙學)≫, so it could not be seen as a complete ≪Baekryeonchohae(百聯抄解解)≫. In addition, ≪Baekryeonchohae(百聯抄解解)≫ includes Jahun(字訓) and Eonhaemun, but ≪Dongmonghak(童蒙學)≫ contains only Eonhaemun without Jahun. In other words, there is a qualitative difference beyond the difference in the absolute quantity of Chinese poetry. Due to these circumstances, ≪Dongmonghak(童蒙學)≫ was viewed as a separate book from ≪Baekryeonchohae(百聯抄解解)≫. On the other hand, the phonological characteristics, morphological vocabulary characteristics and grammatical characteristics of ≪Dongmonghak(童蒙學)≫ which are paired with ≪Baekryeonchohae(百聯抄解解)≫ are generally accompanied by the characteristics of modern Korean. In addition, it contains traces of Jeolla dialect.

키워드