2008년 공동행위관련 판례의 동향

Review of 2008 Cartel Decisions

초록

In 2008, the courts made good number of decisions dealing with allegedly improper concerted acts under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act(hereinafter 'Act'). Most of them are on appeals made against law enforcement decisions by the Fair Trade Commission. Few Of them, however, are particularly noticeable in terms of making new law or creating debates among competition law community. Many of them dealt with issues related to presumption of an agreement under the Act. 19(5) and calculating and levying surcharges for improper concerted acts. Courts generally followed the precedents on presumption of an agreements and made some meaningful progress on issues related to calculation of surcharges. In particular, the Supreme Court announced a couple of important rules clarifying starting and ending point of improper concerted act, and for deciding the number of improper concerted acts which are maintained for long period of time for the purpose of calculating and levying surcharge. Courts also announced some rules on new issues related with the leniency policy which competition authorities are actively pursuing globally.

키워드

cartelimproper concerted actpresumption of an agreementstarting and ending of improper concerted actnumbers of improper concerted actssurchargeleniencycartelimproper concerted actpresumption of an agreementstarting and ending of improper concerted actnumbers of improper concerted actssurchargeleniency부당한 공동행위합의 추정공동행위의 외관합의추정의 복멸합의의 시기 및 종기부당한 공동행위의 개수과징금자진신고
제목
2008년 공동행위관련 판례의 동향
제목 (타언어)
Review of 2008 Cartel Decisions
저자
이호영
발행일
2009-05
저널명
경쟁법연구
19
페이지
330 ~ 366