Raw material criticality assessment with weighted indicators: An application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process

  • Kim, Juhan
  • Lee, Jungbae
  • Kim, BumChoong
  • Kim, Jinsoo
Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

20
Citations

SCOPUS

30

초록

This research focuses on the relative weight of indicators in raw material criticality assessment. The weight of the indicators configured for a criticality assessment varies based on the purpose of the evaluation and the stakeholders. That weight also has a significant impact on the assessment results. Consequently, it is essential to derive the weights using a scientific methodology quantitatively. We applied a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to secure a plausible weight for the appraisal of the raw material criticality in Korea. The results indicate that significant changes in the criticality are observed comparing the results from the previous method. We also set up three groups, those are government, industry, and research, to discuss the differences in a stakeholder's perspective. Our results and discussions on the difference in the weights and criticality for each group could help to establish policies to mitigate the raw material criticality.

키워드

Material criticalityFuzzy AHPWeight of indicatorStakeholderEXTENT ANALYSIS METHODMATERIAL SUPPLY RISKSAHPMETALSMETHODOLOGYSTRATEGIESSECURITYMINERALSDESIGNJAPAN
제목
Raw material criticality assessment with weighted indicators: An application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
저자
Kim, JuhanLee, JungbaeKim, BumChoongKim, Jinsoo
DOI
10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.01.005
발행일
2019-03
유형
Article
저널명
Resources Policy
60
페이지
225 ~ 233