인구문제와 지역재생 - 아베노믹스가 방향을 전환한 이유-

초록

Considering the political philosophy of the conservative Abe administration, Abenomics 1.0 and 2.0 are very different as exemplified by the Trickle-down Effect and Fountain Effect. This is because 1.0 is a central policy focused on conglomerates, urban development, and export-oriented growth. However, 2.0 is changing to a regional government-led policy that is considered to prioritize small- and medium-sized businesses, domestic consumption, and family-oriented policies. Obviously, this change will also accelerate its commitment to implementation and execution. This will be the start from the so-called extinction list in 2014. The policy switch of Abenomics from 1.0 to 2.0 is necessary because of the crisis presented by population problems and a long-term seizure of power linked to political engineering. As a result, they selected the keyword Regional Regeneration aside from their conservative political philosophy. The implications thereof for Korea are briefly summarized in the following three categories: policy changes that deviate from their own philosophy, a major shift in approaches to regional regeneration, and an expanded connection to innovation tasks based on people's priorities.

키워드