공익적 목적의 국유지 유효활용 촉진을 위한 관리제도 개선방안: 한･일 국유지 관리제도 비교를 중심으로

초록

The purpose of this study is to observe the improvement plans and policy orientation in regards to promoting the utilization of state-owned properties through the comparison of state-owned property related policy changes between Korea and Japan. The result shows that Japan is aggressively promoting the utilization policies on state-owned properties in order to resolve the issues of urban land shortage and to gratify the public social demand in regards to its social and economic changes. Japan had established administrative policies for state-owned properties which reflect the social demand and promoted the utilization of state-owned properties in its systematic plans, while improving the policies and legislations related to the national policy support. Korea also advocates the policy for expanding and utilizing state-owned properties and promotes the demonstration development business. However, they are bound to the limited extent. It has been found in the analysis that there are unprofessional measures in regards to the management on land use. There are a number of state-owned properties that are in its low utilization or not utilized at all. The conclusion based on the analysis report of the state-owned properties related legislations, plans and management and operation system can be described as below. First of all, the state-owned property related policy should be established in the aspect of the medium- and long-term plan. This requires an environment development which can promote and establish the administrative policy for state-owned properties in the long-term plan while separating the characteristics of medium- and long-term policy plan and annual operation plan held for state-owned properties integrated plan. Second, there should be more aggressive utilization on administrative properties which are low-usage or decrepit yet relatively favorable in terms of their location in order to meet the social needs. It would require the target for utilization approval and term expansion in the National Property Act. Third, practicable private participation plan and system improvement efforts are required. ‘The long-term property lease’ can be a possible solution within the bounds of the National Property Act, and it would still require utilization approval period and lease period realization in consideration of the National Property Act. The change on the current awareness that the state-owned properties are national common property would initiate the effective utilization on state-owned property.

키워드