인터넷 개인방송 불법･유해 콘텐츠 규제제도 개선방안

초록

Currently, the regulatory system for Internet personal broadcasting has minimal practical regulatory effect, and there is a problem that the standards are different and ambiguous for each operator. Therefore, the research was initiated in that it was necessary to discuss improvement measures that could be reflected in the current system. First of all, this study looked at the media"s view of Internet personal broadcasting and the controversial issues related to Internet personal broadcasting illegal and harmful and regulatory in our society through the analysis of articles in seven major domestic daily newspapers related to Internet personal broadcasting. According to the analysis, there were fake news, money problems, animal abuse, controversy over abusive language, fraudulent gambling, sex-related crimes, pornographic broadcasting and hate speech reported in major daily newspapers. Based on the results of the article analysis, 15 researchers of media legislation and law studies were interviewed in-depth to find out the possibility and effectiveness of improving regulations on Internet personal broadcasting on the Internet. The 15 experts were first asked about the legal definition of personal broadcasting on the Internet, and secondly, the purpose and necessity of regulating illegal and harmful content on personal broadcasting on the Internet, and thirdly, specific relief methods. According to the analysis, Internet private broadcasting mostly agreed to the use of legal terms as well as no alternative terms, but saw that a clear conceptual definition should be made first and then a related law revision should be made. Most researchers agreed that stronger regulations were needed on the need for regulation of illegal and harmful content on personal broadcasting on the Internet. However, it is believed that strong regulations could infringe on freedom of expression, and that content regulations require judgment based on the field. Finally, discussions on specific regulatory methods were divided according to their positions on technical issues, content censorship, and effectiveness. Although I agree with the need for regulation, but with it still difficult to collect a stop in legal and institutional improvement measures, the immediate proposal seems to need the relevant agencies to provide a clear guide for self-regulation by platform operators to work more effectively. As one of the alternatives, it is believed that the Korea Communications Commission or the Korea Communications Standards Commission will need to provide specific guidelines for platform operators to follow the standards and make active management and supervision efforts. At the same time, as confirmed in the Korona 19 incident, a bill needs to be drawn up to strongly regulate clearly illegal content that threatens the safety of the people and causes national social chaos.

키워드